1. Figure 01: Research Intention, p.5, illustrated by author
2. Figure 02: Artificial Intelligence Relations, p.7, illustrated by author, inspired by IBM: https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/artificialintelligence, accessed April 28, 2025.
3. Figure 03: Functionality of GANs, p.9, illustrated by Thalles Silva: https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/an-intuitive-introductionto-generative-adversarial-networks-gans-7a2264a81394/), accessed April 30, 2025.
4. Figure 04: BIM Dimensions, p.11, from: https://www.accasoftware.com/en/bim-software, accessed April 28, 2025.
5. Figure 05: Research strategies, p.13, illustrated by author
6. Figure 06: Offices before digital drawing tools, p.17, Image by: https://www.shapr3d.com/history-of-cad/introduction, accessed April 30, 2025.
7. Figure 06: The Modulor by Le Corbusier, p.18, from: https://snl.no/Modulor, accessed April 30, 2025.
8. Figure 07: Moshe Safdi (1938), Habitat ‘67, p.19, Image by: https://www.safdiearchitects.com/projects/habitat-67, accessed April 30, 2025.
9. Figure 08: Sketchpad developed by Ivan E. Sutherland, p.19, from: https://bimaplus.org/news/the-very-beginning-of-the-digitalrepresentation-ivan-sutherland-sketchpad/, accessed April 30,2025.
10. Figure 09: McNeels’ Rhino 3D - User Interface, p. 20, illustrated by author
11. Figure 10: Main building of the Heydar Aliyev Center in Baku, Azerbaijan (2013) by Zaha Hadid Architects, p.21, Image by vladimirzhoga, File nr.: 758759854, accessed Mai 08, 2025.
12. Figure 12: Hierarchy of conscious-problems, p. 31, illustrated by author, inspired by Max Tegmark, in Life 3.0, p.285
13. Figure 13: Semantics in linguistics and architecture, p. 33, by Stanislas Chaillou: https://stanislaschaillou.com/semanticism.html
14. Figure 14: CAPTCHA, p. 35, from: https://www.reddit.com/r/AutisticAdults/comments/1jfnd3w/these_captchas_kill_me_because_of_the_way_they/#lightbox, accessed April 30, 2025.
15. Figure 15: ICD/ITKE University of Stuttgart - Honeycombs inspired pavilion, p. 41, from: https://www.icd.uni-stuttgart.de/projects/buga-wood-pavilion-2019/, accessed April 30, 2025.
16. Figure 16: Language in ChatGPT - Text Prompt, p. 46, illustrated by author
17. Figure 17: Software language - Code in JavaScript, p. 47, illustrated by author
18. Figure 18: Sketch as a form of being literate: Frank Gehry - Guggenheim Bilbao, p. 49, from: https://www.re-thinkingthefuture. com/case-studies/a2384-walt-disney-concert-hall-by-frank-ogehry-
the-greatest-building-of-our-time/, accessed April 30, 2025.
19. Figure 19: Literacy in ArchiCAD - List of Shortcuts (German Version), p. 49, illustrated by author
20. Figure 20: Literacy in Rhino 3D, Grasshopper Plugin: Energy design, p. 49, illustrated by author
21. Figure 21: Error message based on misscommunication, p. 50, illustrated by author
22. Figure 22: Possible AI supported ideation process inspired by evolutionary creativity, p. 52, from Thoring et al. “The Augmented Designer: A Research Agenda for Generative AI-Enabled Design.” Proceedings of the Design Society 3 (July 2023): 3345–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.335.
23. Figure 23: Survey Questions, p. 55, illustrated by author
24. Figure 24: AI Expertise, p. 56, illustrated by author
25. Figure 25: Total distribution challenges, p. 61, illustrated by author
26. Figure 26: Scale of information, p. 69, illustrated by author
27. Figure 27: Step-by-Step Guideline “How to be an architect” provided by ChatGPT 4.0, p. 76, illustrated by author
28. Figure 28: Architects as T-shaped people, p. 78, from: Thoring and Müller, “Understanding the Creative Mechanisms of Design Thinking: An Evolutionary Approach.”
29. Figure 29: Text prompt: “single family house,” DALL·E 2025-03-24 11.18.43 - A modern single-family house with a gable roof, large windows, a small front porch, and a well-maintained front yard
with green grass and colorful flowers, p. 82, illustrated by author, April 24, 2025.
30. Figure 30: Optimization problem with a large solution space, p. 84, from: Thoring and Müller, “Understanding the Creative Mechanisms of Design Thinking: An Evolutionary Approach.” In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design, 137–47. Eindhoven Netherlands: ACM, 2011.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2079216.2079236.
TABLES
1. Table 1: Scales comparison, p. 59, illustrated by author.
2. Table 2: Attitude towards AI usage, p. 60, illustrated by author.
3. Table 3: Ideation capabilities, p. 61, illustrated by author.
4. Table 4: Results Expert interview - Themes, p. 66, illustrated by author.
Back to Top